Kirstie Allsopp hits back at claim Harry and Meghan’s son denied prince title due to raceMarch 8, 2021
Meghan Markle: Palace will ‘take time’ with response says expert
When you subscribe we will use the information you provide to send you these newsletters.Sometimes they’ll include recommendations for other related newsletters or services we offer.Our Privacy Notice explains more about how we use your data, and your rights.You can unsubscribe at any time.
Kirstie Allsopp, 49, has hit back on Twitter today after Meghan Markle, 39, sensationally claimed during an interview with Oprah Winfrey that her son Archie Mountbatten, one, was denied the title of prince by the Royal Family, because he is mixed race. The Location Location Location host sparked a fiery online debate after she outright denied allegations Archie was not made a prince, after the Duchess of Sussex spoke out alongside her husband Prince Harry on US TV last night.
Kirstie retweeted a headline that questioned if race was a factor behind Archie not being made a prince.
Alongside the article, Kirstie simply typed: “No,” in view of her 423,000 followers.
Quickly the star received a flurry of responses, as fellow tweeters weighed in on the subject.
One said: “I don’t understand this – prince/princess titles were curtailed years before Archie was born. Basic research would tell Oprah that. Prince Edward, also a male prince, has two children without royal titles.”
A second replied: “Exactly. It seems they sometimes contradict themselves – didn’t want him to have a title, yet link lack of it to racism. Ask to move away from their roles confirm this on 7 Jan – yet hurt when Queen confirms this and financial support for the role is taken away.”
While a third replied: “How do you know?”
In a previous tweet by Kirstie, she explained how Archie does have a tittle, albeit not prince, and is known formally as the Earl of Dumbarton.
She wrote: “Archie is the Earl of Dumbarton, but his parents chose not to use that title.
“To be honest I might avoid my son starting school as the Earl of Dumb too.”
The star also reflected on Archie’s lineage, as she revealed there are many others in the royal family not directly in line to the throne, who are also not princes either.
Kirstie shared: “In 1961 the only sister of The Queen had a son, David, when born he was 5th in line to the throne, he’s not a Prince. Almost 60 years later, when the Royal Family is trying to downsize & modernise, it seems unlikely that the 7th in line would be a Prince, but maybe it’s racism.”
This particular comment upset one follower who replied: “Oh no! Not You Kirsty!!! Surely having several conversations about how dark Archie’s skin will be is racist?? You’ve chosen to focus on the title!! Disappointed.”(sic)
Patrick J Adams’s fury over Meghan Markle post: ‘What the hell!’ [ROW]
Louise Minchin addresses ‘change’ in relationship with husband [INSIGHT]
Boy George criticises Oprah’s handling of Meghan and Harry interview [LATEST]
Kirstie clarified her comment, by admitting she had not seen the whole interview yet but had only watched clips online. As the interview is to be broadcast tonight in the UK.
She typed back: “In the clip from the interview, the whole of which I have not seen, it seemed as if the two were linked. I’m just saying it’s likely that that is not the case.
“I do not deny for a single second Meghan has been targeted by racists, but within Harry’s family too?”
Source: Read Full Article